All ideas

As per LTN 1/20 6.2.22 Centre line markings 50mm to TSGRD diag. 1008 should be applied to two-way cycle tracks. Currently there is no option to do this without custom lines.

This is to allow users who have x-refed in a line model to turn of ribbed markings if they do not want the markings to be shown with them.

Ability to change the colour of ribbed mark on 1012.2 / 1012.3. This will allow a user who has x-refed in the road marking file the ability to change the colour of a ribbed marking.

Be able to create a yellow box marking for roundabout circulatorys. Currently yellow box markings in Line only allow for 4 vertices and are unable to be curved.

An option to design a traffic sign to diag. 2501 (parking place sign with a distance). Currently there is no option to do this without manually creating it.

An option to quickly design Pollution Control Device signs as per DMRB CG 501 Design of Highway Drainage Systems

If designing a lined porous paving system, you are unable to have it non-attenuating. This requirement should be removed to design it to discharge elsewhere

Industry wide drainage system manholes are normally named as S1 and F1, can we add a function to add a prefix to the nodes in Flow, avoids the element of human error having to manually name everything. This option is available in microdrainage, it...

when there is an error with an alignment, the software doesn't tell you where that error actually. You just get the red "i" next to the alignment, saying 2road/feature self interesects" or "cannot merge with finished surface" This is very frustrat...

It would be extremely useful if FLOW could calculate the infiltration areas of infiltration basins/flow through ponds rather than having to calculate it ourselves. For example, if we suggest a minimum base area, height and side slope, then FLOW wo...